From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH] add transport class symlink to device object Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 00:57:04 -0500 Message-ID: <200509010057.06479.dtor_core@ameritech.net> References: <9BB4DECD4CFE6D43AA8EA8D768ED51C201AD35@xbl3.ma.emulex.com> <20050831214307.GE20443@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050831214307.GE20443@kroah.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: James Bottomley , Matthew Wilcox , James.Smart@emulex.com, Andrew Morton , SCSI Mailing List , Linux Kernel , Alan Cox , Russell King , Dmitry Torokhov List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 31 August 2005 16:43, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:50:19PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On 8/18/05, Greg KH wrote: > > > @@ -500,9 +519,13 @@ int class_device_add(struct class_device > > > } > > > > > > class_device_add_attrs(class_dev); > > > - if (class_dev->dev) > > > + if (class_dev->dev) { > > > + class_name = make_class_name(class_dev); > > > sysfs_create_link(&class_dev->kobj, > > > &class_dev->dev->kobj, "device"); > > > + sysfs_create_link(&class_dev->dev->kobj, &class_dev->kobj, > > > + class_name); > > > + } > > > > > > > I wonder if we need to grab a reference to class_dev->dev here: > > > > dev = device_get(class_dev->dev); > > if (dev) { > > .... > > } > > > > Otherwise, if device gets unregistered/deleted before class device is > > deleted we'll get into trouble when removing the link since > > class_dev->dev will be garbage. > > > > .. But grabbing that reference will cause pains in SCSI system which, > > when I looked, removed class devices from device's release function. > > No the sysfs_create_link() call increments the kobject reference on the > target of the symlink. See sysfs_add_link() for details. So this > should be just fine, right? > Yes, you are right. Sorry for the moise. -- Dmitry