RE: eh_active checks in qla2xxx error handling

Duane Grigsby
2005-09-19T20:47:14Z

Yes, agreed. I believe that code was ported from 2.4 driver where the
error handler expected DID_RESET status.

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Christoph Hellwig
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 1:04 PM
To: Andrew Vasquez
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: eh_active checks in qla2xxx error handling

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 02:20:28PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> qla2xxx is the only driver looking at eh_active, and doing the wait
> for oustanding commands only from EH thread resets but not from the
> ioctls looks rather wrong to me. Do you remember the rational for it?

ping?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html