Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Pending patches
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:42:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050907194236.GA26071@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1126104473.4823.8.camel@mulgrave>

James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 16:17 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112238726326927&w=2

On as542. The first hunk of the diff is already in (declare of
scsi_host_set_state). The second hunk looks good (SHOST_RECOVERY label).
The third hunk I will take in combination with the other patch that
effects the scan code. This should have probably been
another patch.

> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112238771326644&w=2

Have not looked at this yet, but will look at it in combination to the
above scan change.

> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112238804301664&w=2

Do we need to revist how we are walking these lists for cleanup post
James's kilst fix / update?

> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112238825727146&w=2

This looks ok for an added check, but I guess I need to look at old mail
and understand how we got here with the added scan mutex.

> 
> I was hoping that Mike Anderson would review these, but since he hasn't
> I'll take a look.

Sorry asleep at the keyboard on these. Comments above if you have not
already looked at them.

-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@us.ibm.com

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-07 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-06 20:17 Pending patches Alan Stern
2005-09-06 20:28 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-09-06 20:43   ` Alan Stern
2005-09-07 14:47 ` James Bottomley
2005-09-07 19:42   ` Mike Anderson [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-13 16:43 Alan Stern
2009-07-15 18:01 Alan Stern
2009-07-16  1:02 ` James Bottomley
2009-07-16 14:07   ` Alan Stern
2009-07-31 19:05   ` Alan Stern
2010-04-01 15:21 Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050907194236.GA26071@us.ibm.com \
    --to=andmike@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox