From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT 2/4] add scsi helpers Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:29:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20050915182939.GA1316@infradead.org> References: <1126736388.16778.25.camel@max> <20050915101303.GB24689@infradead.org> <4329AF9F.1030209@cs.wisc.edu> <4329B586.6010802@cs.wisc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:12251 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030566AbVIOS3k (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:29:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4329B586.6010802@cs.wisc.edu> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Christie Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:55:18PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote: > Actually after talking with Jens, I think it is better to keep the > function in scsi_lib and move my blk_rq_map_iov() function there. The > problem is that sg and st have some special needs and as a result do > some things like partial setup themselves. It looks like nobody wants > the burdon of having these special case fucntions :) but since SCSI's > ULDs are the only user and probably will be the only user does it make > sense to keep them there? ok, makes sense