From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: [PATCH] procfs support for sgiwd93 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:47:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20051017104729.GB4884@linux-mips.org> References: <20051015013824.GA25248@linux-mips.org> <20051017104312.GB22710@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from extgw-uk.mips.com ([62.254.210.129]:22288 "EHLO bacchus.net.dhis.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932252AbVJQKrl (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 06:47:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051017104312.GB22710@infradead.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:43:12AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > NACK, no more new procfs support for scsi driver. > > The sgiwd93.h removal is fine, but please also mark all functions that > were in it previously static. It's not like this is really adding procfs support; it's more wiring up a function in sgiwd93.c that exists anyway in wd33c93.c. Ralf