From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:58:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20051022105815.GB3027@infradead.org> References: <4359395B.9030402@pobox.com> <43593FE1.7020506@adaptec.com> <4359440E.2050702@pobox.com> <43595275.1000308@adaptec.com> <435959BE.5040101@pobox.com> <43595CA6.9010802@adaptec.com> <43596070.3090902@pobox.com> <43596859.3020801@adaptec.com> <43596F16.7000606@pobox.com> <435A1793.1050805@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <435A1793.1050805@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Richter Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , Jeff Garzik , Luben Tuikov , andrew.patterson@hp.com, Christoph Hellwig , "Moore, Eric Dean" , jejb@steeleye.com, Linus Torvalds List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:42:27PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > A. Post mock-ups and pseudo code about how to change the core, discuss. > B. Set up a scsi-cleanup tree. In this tree, > 1. renovate the core (thereby break all command set drivers and > all transport subsystems), No way. Doing things from scatch is a really bad idea. See how far we came with Linux 2.6 scsi vs 2.4 scsi without throwing everything away and break the world. Please submit changes to fix _one_ thing at a time and fix all users. Repeat until done or you don't care anymore.