From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: matthew@wil.cx, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SCSI] fix scsi_reap_target() device_del from atomic context
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:54:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051223195436.18fd5a1e.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1135353536.3728.15.camel@mulgrave>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you could use work_struct.data for the scsi_target* and get back to
> > the work_struct via container_of().
>
> Could you elaborate some more on this? If I simply use the starget
> pointer as my work_struct.data, how do I get back to the actual
> work_struct for me to free it? It's not passed in to the function as
> far as I can tell. But even if I do this, I still have to manage the
> allocation and deallocation of the work_struct.
>
err, no, I'm full of it. container_of() does pointer arithmetic to convert
a pointer to foo.bar into a pointer to foo. But in this case the callback
would have the value of work_struct.data, not the address of it, so it
cannot be done.
Most usage in drivers would be something like:
struct driver_thing {
...
struct work_struct work;
};
and driver_thing.work.data gets a driver_thing* put into it. So the need
to separately kmalloc the work_struct+data wrapper is relatively unusual.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-24 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200512212359.jBLNxluV016971@hera.kernel.org>
2005-12-23 6:13 ` [SCSI] fix scsi_reap_target() device_del from atomic context Andrew Morton
2005-12-23 12:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-12-23 15:27 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-23 15:38 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-23 15:58 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-24 3:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-12-23 20:05 ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-12-23 20:30 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-23 20:46 ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-12-23 20:43 ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-12-23 20:53 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-23 21:26 ` Sergey Vlasov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051223195436.18fd5a1e.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox