public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SCSI] fix scsi_reap_target() device_del from atomic context
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:26:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051223212604.GA9382@procyon.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1135371219.3728.50.camel@mulgrave>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1978 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:53:39PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 23:43 +0300, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> > So if that GFP_ATOMIC allocation ever fails, the target is leaked
> > forever - does not look nice.
> 
> Yes, but it will print a warning.
> 
> > Does anything depend on starget->siblings being empty after we had
> > removed it from the shost->__targets list it was on?  Seems that all
> > other uses of this field are:
> >
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:313:   list_for_each_entry(starget, &shost->__targets, siblings) {
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:365:   INIT_LIST_HEAD(&starget->siblings);
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:373:   list_add_tail(&starget->siblings, &shost->__targets);
> > 
> > So probably we can reuse this field and do deferred reaping without any
> > memory allocation at all.  The following patch should be applied
> > _instead_ of the James' patch, not on top of it (I can make a combined
> > patch if it is desired).  The difference with the previous patch is that
> > scsi_target_reap() still removes the target from shost->__targets
> > immediately - only device_del() and subsequent actions are deferred to a
> > workqueue.
> 
> No, you can't.
> 
> If you do this, the target namespace will potentially be in use in sysfs
> after the system thinks the target is gone.  Thus, any reallocation
> fails because you can't add a new target with the same name as an
> existing one.

Ah, I see now... scsi_alloc_target() checks if a target with the same
channel/id combination is on the list and adds new target only if
there was no such one before.

However, what prevents a race between scsi_target_reap_work() and
scsi_alloc_target()?  If the worker thread is interrupted/preempted
just after releasing host_lock (when it has already removed the target
from the list, but before it has called device_del()),
scsi_alloc_target() might consider the target as new and get to
device_add() faster.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2005-12-23 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200512212359.jBLNxluV016971@hera.kernel.org>
2005-12-23  6:13 ` [SCSI] fix scsi_reap_target() device_del from atomic context Andrew Morton
2005-12-23 12:15   ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-12-23 15:27     ` James Bottomley
2005-12-23 15:38       ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-23 15:58         ` James Bottomley
2005-12-24  3:54           ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-23 20:05   ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-12-23 20:30     ` James Bottomley
2005-12-23 20:46       ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-12-23 20:43   ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-12-23 20:53     ` James Bottomley
2005-12-23 21:26       ` Sergey Vlasov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051223212604.GA9382@procyon.home \
    --to=vsu@altlinux.ru \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox