From: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
To: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc1 crash in scsi_target_reap_work
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:47:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060222164750.GA433@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43FC774B.8050301@us.ibm.com>
Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> I would guess that the -EEXIST is coming from:
>
> create_dir
> sysfs_create_dir
> create_dir
> kobject_add
> device_add
>
> Looking at the scsi_target reap code, it looks like there is a race condition. The
> target is removed from the hosts list of targets under the host lock, then the host
> lock is released. If another thread tries to add the same target that is being
> tore down at this point (before device_del), the device_add will fail with EEXIST
> since the sysfs directory for the device still exists.
>
> Any reason we can't protect the target reaping code from this by grabbing the
> scan_mutex?
Another manifestation is a bug I was recently looking at where a BUG_ON is
triggered in the aic7xxx driver if someone is removing and adding devices
repeatably.
"Feb 8 14:21:52 test klogd: kernel BUG at
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c:535!"
The scan mutex I believe would not help in the case I describe above as
the issue in this instance is the widow between the call of
"list_del_init(&starget->siblings);" and the call to target_destroy.
-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-22 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-17 0:05 2.6.15-git12, slab corruption in ipr Olaf Hering
2006-01-18 18:42 ` Brian King
2006-01-19 21:05 ` Olaf Hering
2006-01-30 10:46 ` Olaf Hering
2006-01-30 16:49 ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-06 22:04 ` 2.6.16-rc1 crash in scsi_target_reap_work Olaf Hering
2006-02-06 22:26 ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-06 22:44 ` James Bottomley
2006-02-09 20:05 ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-10 10:11 ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-10 14:04 ` James Bottomley
2006-02-10 14:10 ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-10 23:01 ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-10 23:21 ` Brian King
2006-02-10 23:29 ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-11 10:34 ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-20 23:00 ` Brian King
2006-02-22 8:36 ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-22 14:38 ` Brian King
2006-02-22 15:53 ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-22 16:47 ` Mike Anderson [this message]
2006-02-22 17:05 ` James Bottomley
2006-02-10 21:28 ` Brian King
2006-01-30 18:07 ` 2.6.15-git12, slab corruption in ipr Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060222164750.GA433@us.ibm.com \
--to=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).