From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luben Tuikov Subject: RE: [RFC] aic94xx: attaching to the sas transport class Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 00:50:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20060304085054.22598.qmail@web31806.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <1141445373.5397.23.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Reply-To: ltuikov@yahoo.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from web31806.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.207.69]:49518 "HELO web31806.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751631AbWCDIuz (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Mar 2006 03:50:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1141445373.5397.23.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley , "Tarte, Robert" Cc: linux-scsi --- James Bottomley wrote: > > What exactly needs to happen in order for expanders to be supported? > > Who is planning to make those changes and do they need any help? > > I'll do this ... well, try ... not actually having a configuration with > expanders makes it rather hard but I can at least write most of the code > and give it to someone with a more complex topology to test. Why not let someone with equipment and understanding of the technology do that? Why self-appoint yourself to this? Does this make sense?