From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: osst changes required to move forward to block request Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 23:43:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20060307224321.GB17487@lst.de> References: <20060206131944.GA1769@lst.de> <1139274141l.7464l.1l@athena.riede.org> <20060207091254.GA11691@infradead.org> <1139687216l.24984l.0l@athena.riede.org> <20060307115913.GA30421@infradead.org> <1141768417.3239.52.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:15575 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964829AbWCGWnb (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:43:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1141768417.3239.52.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Willem Riede , Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 03:53:37PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 11:59 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > James, could you put this into the scsi-misc tree so we don't have any ULD > > using the scsi_request APIs anymore? > > OK, done ... now could someone actually test it? Willem tested it.