From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic94xx: move entirely over to correct transport class formulation Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:07:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20060328150709.GA17420@infradead.org> References: <1143499534.3334.33.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:59565 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750802AbWC1PHL (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:07:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1143499534.3334.33.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:45:34PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > This patch moves the sas class over to being a transport class (the sas > event functions now become transport functions) and the aic94xx now sets > everything up in the standard transport class way. > > I've also fixed the multiple instance problem and verified that two > cards in the same box work. Adding an own transport class for aic94xx seems very wrong. It should attach to the standard sas one and use the sas-class based code as some kind of libsas.