From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
To: Linux SCSI list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Continue after PQ3 on LUN0
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 02:48:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060501004800.GD8728@tpkurt.garloff.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060501004457.GC8728@tpkurt.garloff.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3141 bytes --]
From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
Subject: Tolerate PQ 3 at LUN 0 for scanning
Some devices report a peripheral qualifier of 3 for LUN 0; with the original
code, we would still try a REPORT_LUNS scan (if SCSI level is >= 3 or if we
have the BLIST_REPORTLUNS2 passed in), but NOT any sequential scan.
Also, the device at LUN 0 (which is not connected according to the PQ) is not
registered with the OS.
Unfortunately, SANs exist that are SCSI-2 and do NOT support REPORT_LUNS, but
report a unknown device with PQ 3 on LUN 0. We still need to scan them, and
most probably we even need BLIST_SPARSELUN (and BLIST_LARGELUN). See the next
patch for an example.
This is patch 1/3:
If we end up in sequential scan, at least try LUN 1 for devices
that reported a PQ of 3 for LUN 0.
Also return blacklist flags, even for PQ3 devices.
Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
diff -uNrp linux-2.6-hg/drivers/scsi.0/scsi_scan.c linux-2.6-hg/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
--- linux-2.6-hg/drivers/scsi.0/scsi_scan.c 2006-04-19 08:55:03.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6-hg/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c 2006-04-24 07:37:39.000000000 +0200
@@ -880,6 +880,8 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct
if (scsi_probe_lun(sdev, result, result_len, &bflags))
goto out_free_result;
+ if (bflagsp)
+ *bflagsp = bflags;
/*
* result contains valid SCSI INQUIRY data.
*/
@@ -920,8 +922,6 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct
sdev->lockable = 0;
scsi_unlock_floptical(sdev, result);
}
- if (bflagsp)
- *bflagsp = bflags;
}
out_free_result:
@@ -946,7 +946,6 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct
* scsi_sequential_lun_scan - sequentially scan a SCSI target
* @starget: pointer to target structure to scan
* @bflags: black/white list flag for LUN 0
- * @lun0_res: result of scanning LUN 0
*
* Description:
* Generally, scan from LUN 1 (LUN 0 is assumed to already have been
@@ -956,8 +955,7 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct
* Modifies sdevscan->lun.
**/
static void scsi_sequential_lun_scan(struct scsi_target *starget,
- int bflags, int lun0_res, int scsi_level,
- int rescan)
+ int bflags, int scsi_level, int rescan)
{
unsigned int sparse_lun, lun, max_dev_lun;
struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(starget->dev.parent);
@@ -978,13 +976,6 @@ static void scsi_sequential_lun_scan(str
sparse_lun = 0;
/*
- * If not sparse lun and no device attached at LUN 0 do not scan
- * any further.
- */
- if (!sparse_lun && (lun0_res != SCSI_SCAN_LUN_PRESENT))
- return;
-
- /*
* If less than SCSI_1_CSS, and no special lun scaning, stop
* scanning; this matches 2.4 behaviour, but could just be a bug
* (to continue scanning a SCSI_1_CSS device).
@@ -1395,7 +1386,7 @@ static void __scsi_scan_target(struct de
* do a sequential scan.
*/
scsi_sequential_lun_scan(starget, bflags,
- res, starget->scsi_level, rescan);
+ starget->scsi_level, rescan);
}
out_reap:
--
Kurt Garloff, Head Architect Linux R&D, Novell Inc.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-01 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-01 0:44 [PATCH 0/3] Resend: Handle PQ3 devs better Kurt Garloff
2006-05-01 0:48 ` Kurt Garloff [this message]
2006-05-01 0:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] BLIST_ATTACH_PQ3 flag Kurt Garloff
2006-05-01 0:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] Print warning for PQ3 devs Kurt Garloff
2006-05-01 1:04 ` [PATCH 0/3] Resend: Handle PQ3 devs better James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060501004800.GD8728@tpkurt.garloff.de \
--to=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox