From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 22:21:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20060512202137.GC29077@harddisk-recovery.com> References: <20060511151456.GD3755@harddisk-recovery.com> <15ddcffd0605112153q57f139a1k7068e204a3eeaf1f@mail.gmail.com> <20060512171632.GA29077@harddisk-recovery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from dtp.xs4all.nl ([80.126.206.180]:17292 "HELO abra2.bitwizard.nl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932218AbWELUVj (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2006 16:21:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Or Gerlitz , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, axboe@suse.de, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:36:57AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > It sounds like you used some other test-case than the trivial module above > to test bisection? Yes, my test case is in here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=114736053211943&w=2 > So when you say "I tracked _it_ down with git bisect" (my emphasis), it > sounds like "it" was really something else than the trivial stand-alone > module. Or are you saying that the trivial stand-alone module _also_ got > fixed? Sorry for being unclear. "it" is the bug report I send to linux-scsi (see url above). Erik -- +-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 -- | Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands