From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Return -EINVAL when "id == max_id" in scsi_scan_host_selected() Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 22:05:42 -0600 Message-ID: <20060521040542.GA4241@parisc-linux.org> References: <1148108792.13190.36.camel@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20060521033428.61699.qmail@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:17616 "EHLO palinux.external.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751422AbWEUEFn (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2006 00:05:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060521033428.61699.qmail@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Luben Tuikov Cc: Amit Arora , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, patmans@us.ibm.com On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 08:34:28PM -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote: > As to your particular gripe: you're right. But I doubt anything would > get fixed or changed any time soon. There is very little competence > which also has power to change things in the SCSI part of the Linux. > Take a look at the SCSI mailing list archives for good ol' laughs. Hey, Luben. Nice to hear from you again. Unfortunately, you seem to have forgotton to attach a patch to solve this particular issue.