Re: 2.6.17-mm5 dislikes raid-1, just like mm4

Andrew Morton
2006-07-01T22:58:46Z

On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 18:52:12 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 03:22:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no> wrote:
> > > kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> > > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-CF Rev: 1.64
> > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00
> > > sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi removable disk sdf
> > > sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg5 type 0
> > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-MS Rev: 1.64
> > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00
> > > sd 3:0:0:1: Attached scsi removable disk sdg
> > > sd 3:0:0:1: Attached scsi generic sg6 type 0
> > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-SM Rev: 1.64
> > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00
> > > sd 3:0:0:2: Attached scsi removable disk sdh
> > > sd 3:0:0:2: Attached scsi generic sg7 type 0
> > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-SD/MMC Rev: 1.64
> > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00
>
> > I assume this is still the broken-barriers bug. Thanks for all the help on
> > this, guys. More is to be asked for, I'm afraid.
> >
> > I've prepared a tree which is basically 2.6.17-mm5, only the git-scsi-misc
> > and git-libata-all trees have been omitted. It's at
>
> What does USB storage have to do with SATA?
>

Please read the mailing list - several of these reports have been with
sata.

Yes, thank you. As this report is against usb-storage then the bug most
probably lies in git-scsi-misc.