From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Conversion to generic boolean Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:46:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20060829114634.GE4076@infradead.org> References: <44EFBEFA.2010707@student.ltu.se> <20060828093202.GC8980@infradead.org> <20060828171804.09c01846.akpm@osdl.org> <44F3952B.5000500@yahoo.com.au> <1156836578.26009.6.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:50617 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964958AbWH2LrG (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:47:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1156836578.26009.6.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Anton Altaparmakov Cc: Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Richard Knutsson , James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:29:38AM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > Not sure whether this is meant in favour of one or the other but we are > not programming in C strictly speaking but in C99+gccisms and C99 > includes _Bool... as does it include float, double, _Complex and other things we don't use.