From: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
"Hammer, Jack" <Jack_Hammer@adaptec.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, alexisb@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: timeout during sas discovery (aic94xx)
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:50:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060829165018.GA11897@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1156868572.3458.25.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 09:03 -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> > I think this failure mode is a different path than what your patch tries to
> > address. We sending a inquiry to the device and coming through the
> > standard IO path and not through sas_execute_task.
> >
> > I still think for these cases that we need to be running the patch I
> > previous sent to the list to try and get the abort to work (this patch is
> > not in the git tree so one needs to add this on top of the git source).
> > This will not solve the timeout, but would at least address the tmf time
> > out.
>
> OK ... I was waiting for Adaptec to comment on that one since it's
> messing with undocumented sequencer bits. However, prove it works in
> this case and I can put it in.
ok, yes it would be good for Adaptec to comment on the proper format for
the abort_hscb as add I did was set the values to match what the adp
driver was doing as the aic94xx abort_task always timed out for our cases.
>
> > We need to also address the first issue of the inquiry timeout. Previous
> > runs showed that we where hitting this error a lot on the inquiry to the
> > Vitesse SES device which the adp driver has created a work around (unclear
> > if the work around solves the issue or not).
>
> What is the work around?
Link reset wait 4 seconds and then retry. Since this is a timeout on a
scan inquiry getting a retry to happen in scsi_probe_lun once the error
handler has started up will not be easy.
-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@us.ibm.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-29 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-28 23:18 timeout during sas discovery (aic94xx) malahal
2006-08-29 5:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2006-08-29 13:53 ` James Bottomley
2006-08-29 16:03 ` Mike Anderson
2006-08-29 16:22 ` James Bottomley
2006-08-29 16:50 ` Mike Anderson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060829165018.GA11897@us.ibm.com \
--to=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Jack_Hammer@adaptec.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=alexisb@us.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox