From: mmzz@stat.unipd.it (Alberto Cammozzo)
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lp8000 and 2.6.18-rc6
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:29:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060911162905.GB17756@stat.unipd.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <450554CF.4060906@emulex.com>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:21:35AM -0400, James Smart wrote:
> What this tells me is that the reporting as a scsi-4 device is
> telling the midlayer to use Report Luns, and that Report Luns is likely
> failing on this target. If the manual scans succeed, it says the
> luns are there, but were not reported in Report Luns. What you are
> encountering is an interaction between the target device and the midlayer
> scan behaviors. You should have like behavior on other adapters.
> Sounds like this device could use a device list entry.
I can post some other log if someone finds it useful, anyway
other adapters (serveraid, adaptech, iscsi) on the same system
fill also their /proc stuff, this is the reason why I never
noticed my scsi userspace tools were obsolete. Debian Sarge
being supposedly _stable_, it was a bit a surprise for me...
It is likely that this kind of problem will show up frequently
while old userpace tools are not fully updated and transition to
sys completed.
> Please note: it is general practice that /proc stuff for adapters is
> being deprecated in lieu of using the /sys/class/scsi_host/host<#>
> attributes. This has been true for the lpfc driver as it was a
> requirement when we first integrated into kernel.org around 2.6.10.
> Expect other adapters to behave the same as lpfc.
OK, Thank you.
Alberto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-11 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-09 21:08 lp8000 and 2.6.18-rc6 Alberto Cammozzo
2006-09-10 13:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-10 21:04 ` Alberto Cammozzo
2006-09-11 1:06 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-09-11 2:17 ` James Bottomley
2006-09-11 9:51 ` Alberto Cammozzo
2006-09-11 12:21 ` James Smart
2006-09-11 16:29 ` Alberto Cammozzo [this message]
2006-09-11 6:40 ` Alberto Cammozzo
2006-09-11 17:00 ` James Bottomley
2006-09-12 6:45 ` Alberto Cammozzo
2006-09-13 14:11 ` James Bottomley
2006-09-13 14:44 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-09-13 15:20 ` James Bottomley
2006-09-13 15:33 ` Patrick Mansfield
2006-09-13 15:37 ` Alberto Cammozzo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-09 21:03 Alberto Cammozzo
2006-09-09 21:01 Alberto Cammozzo
2006-09-10 14:03 ` James Smart
2006-09-10 20:43 ` Alberto Cammozzo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060911162905.GB17756@stat.unipd.it \
--to=mmzz@stat.unipd.it \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox