From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Linux-Kernel," <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"J.A. Magall??n" <jamagallon@ono.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@free.fr>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2)
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:36:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061001193616.GF16272@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1159729523.2891.408.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:05:23PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > int pci_request_irq(struct pci_dev *pdev, irq_handler_t handler,
> > unsigned long flags, const char *name, void *data)
> > {
> > if (!valid_irq(pdev->irq)) {
> > dev_printk(KERN_ERR, &pdev->dev, "invalid irq\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > return request_irq(pdev->irq, handler, flags | IRQF_SHARED, name, data);
> > }
>
> well... why not go one step further and eliminate the flags argument
> entirely? And use pci_name() for the name (so eliminate the argument ;)
> and always pass pdev as data, so that that argument can go away too....
>
> that'll cover 99% of the request_irq() users for pci devices.. and makes
> it really nicely simple and consistent.
hmm. $ echo `cut -c34- /proc/interrupts`
timer i8042 cascade acpi yenta, ehci_hcd:usb1, Intel 82801DB-ICH4 yenta,
uhci_hcd:usb2 uhci_hcd:usb4, eth0 ide0 uhci_hcd:usb3, eth1
Network drivers use their eth%d name. USB drivers use [eu]hci_hcd:usb%d.
Others tend to use the driver name. Changing them all to be 0000:00:1d.2
isn't really an improvement in the readability of /proc/interrupts, IMO.
Passing pdev as the data is a good idea for practically no device driver.
It's rare to actually want the pci_device down in the interrupt handler;
normally you want the device private data. Using pci_get_drvdata(pdev)
as the data would make sense for both sym2 and tg3. I don't feel like
auditing other drivers to see if it'd make sense for them too.
So, current proposal:
int pci_request_irq(struct pci_dev *pdev, irq_handler_t handler,
const char *name)
{
if (!valid_irq(pdev->irq)) {
dev_printk(KERN_ERR, &pdev->dev, "invalid irq\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
return request_irq(pdev->irq, handler, IRQF_SHARED, name,
pci_get_drvdata(pdev));
}
But what about IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-01 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060928014623.ccc9b885.akpm@osdl.org>
2006-09-29 13:57 ` 2.6.18-mm2 J.A. Magallón
2006-09-29 14:39 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-29 17:15 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Alan Cox
2006-09-29 23:50 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Frederik Deweerdt
2006-09-29 23:43 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Alan Cox
2006-09-30 14:09 ` [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2) Frederik Deweerdt
2006-09-30 14:19 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-30 13:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-30 23:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-01 14:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-01 19:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-01 19:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-01 19:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-01 19:36 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2006-10-01 19:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-02 2:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-02 20:00 ` [RFC PATCH] pci_request_irq (was [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity) Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:09 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 20:07 ` [RFC PATCH] move aic7xxx to pci_request_irq Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:02 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 3:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-02 20:11 ` [RFC PATCH] move tg3 " Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:04 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 7:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-02 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH] move drm " Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:07 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 20:36 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-02 22:26 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 23:54 ` Dave Airlie
2006-10-03 7:17 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 3:58 ` [RFC PATCH] pci_request_irq (was [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity) Randy Dunlap
2006-10-01 21:31 ` [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2) Frederik Deweerdt
2006-09-30 15:26 ` 2.6.18-mm2 James Bottomley
2006-09-30 16:21 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-30 17:20 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Mark Rustad
2006-09-30 20:54 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Alan Cox
2006-09-29 23:15 ` 2.6.18-mm2 J.A. Magallón
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061001193616.GF16272@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=deweerdt@free.fr \
--cc=jamagallon@ono.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox