public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Linux-Kernel," <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"J.A. Magall??n" <jamagallon@ono.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@free.fr>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2)
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:36:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061001193616.GF16272@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1159729523.2891.408.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:05:23PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > int pci_request_irq(struct pci_dev *pdev, irq_handler_t handler,
> > 			unsigned long flags, const char *name, void *data)
> > {
> > 	if (!valid_irq(pdev->irq)) {
> > 		dev_printk(KERN_ERR, &pdev->dev, "invalid irq\n");
> > 		return -EINVAL;
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	return request_irq(pdev->irq, handler, flags | IRQF_SHARED, name, data);
> > }
> 
> well... why not go one step further and eliminate the flags argument
> entirely? And use pci_name() for the name (so eliminate the argument ;)
> and always pass pdev as data, so that that argument can go away too....
> 
> that'll cover 99% of the request_irq() users for pci devices.. and makes
> it really nicely simple and consistent.

hmm.  $ echo `cut -c34- /proc/interrupts`
timer i8042 cascade acpi yenta, ehci_hcd:usb1, Intel 82801DB-ICH4 yenta,
uhci_hcd:usb2 uhci_hcd:usb4, eth0 ide0 uhci_hcd:usb3, eth1

Network drivers use their eth%d name.  USB drivers use [eu]hci_hcd:usb%d.
Others tend to use the driver name.  Changing them all to be 0000:00:1d.2
isn't really an improvement in the readability of /proc/interrupts, IMO.

Passing pdev as the data is a good idea for practically no device driver.
It's rare to actually want the pci_device down in the interrupt handler;
normally you want the device private data.  Using pci_get_drvdata(pdev)
as the data would make sense for both sym2 and tg3.  I don't feel like
auditing other drivers to see if it'd make sense for them too.

So, current proposal:

int pci_request_irq(struct pci_dev *pdev, irq_handler_t handler,
			const char *name)
{
	if (!valid_irq(pdev->irq)) {
		dev_printk(KERN_ERR, &pdev->dev, "invalid irq\n");
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	return request_irq(pdev->irq, handler, IRQF_SHARED, name,
				pci_get_drvdata(pdev));
}

But what about IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-01 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060928014623.ccc9b885.akpm@osdl.org>
2006-09-29 13:57 ` 2.6.18-mm2 J.A. Magallón
2006-09-29 14:39   ` 2.6.18-mm2 Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-29 17:15     ` 2.6.18-mm2 Alan Cox
2006-09-29 23:50       ` 2.6.18-mm2 Frederik Deweerdt
2006-09-29 23:43         ` 2.6.18-mm2 Alan Cox
2006-09-30 14:09           ` [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2) Frederik Deweerdt
2006-09-30 14:19             ` Alan Cox
2006-09-30 13:51               ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-30 23:58             ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-01 14:28               ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-01 19:05                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-01 19:19                   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-01 19:34                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-01 19:36                   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2006-10-01 19:42                     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-02  2:12                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-02 20:00                       ` [RFC PATCH] pci_request_irq (was [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity) Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:15                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:09                           ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 20:07                         ` [RFC PATCH] move aic7xxx to pci_request_irq Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:27                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:02                             ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03  3:45                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-02 20:11                         ` [RFC PATCH] move tg3 " Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:28                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:04                             ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03  7:18                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-02 20:12                         ` [RFC PATCH] move drm " Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:37                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:07                             ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 20:36                           ` Alan Cox
2006-10-02 22:26                             ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 23:54                           ` Dave Airlie
2006-10-03  7:17                             ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03  3:58                         ` [RFC PATCH] pci_request_irq (was [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity) Randy Dunlap
2006-10-01 21:31               ` [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2) Frederik Deweerdt
2006-09-30 15:26         ` 2.6.18-mm2 James Bottomley
2006-09-30 16:21           ` 2.6.18-mm2 Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-30 17:20             ` 2.6.18-mm2 Mark Rustad
2006-09-30 20:54           ` 2.6.18-mm2 Alan Cox
2006-09-29 23:15     ` 2.6.18-mm2 J.A. Magallón

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061001193616.GF16272@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=deweerdt@free.fr \
    --cc=jamagallon@ono.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox