public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Panic from mptspi_dv_renegotiate_work in 2.6.18-mm2
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:37:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061002163733.610a3c1f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <664A4EBB07F29743873A87CF62C26D703507DA@NAMAIL4.ad.lsil.com>

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:21:08 -0600
"Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@lsil.com> wrote:

> On Monday, October 02, 2006 2:40 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: 
> 
> > 
> > Yeah, Bryce@osdl is hitting this.  Apparently it can be worked around
> > by compiling the driver as a module.
> >
> 
> What I saw in Bryces trace was the driver was not receiving interrupts
> for
> the first command sent after interrutps were enabled.  This was a config
> page
> for spi port pages.  Since this command timed out, an internal timeout
> handler was called,
> and we issued an internal host reset.  The host reset called each
> driver,
> such as mptspi, mptfc, mptsas,  callback handers.  That ended with
> as pacin in mptspi, due to we assume ioc->hd to be a valid pointer.  
> We don't allocate ioc->hd to well after mpt_attach, which is where the
> config
> page that timed out.    We could prevent the panic in mptspi, but that 
> doesn't fix the problem why we are not getting interrupts.   
> 
> I have a 2.6.18 gold kernel, and that works fine with modules.  
> There are no changes in mpt stack since 2.6.18 that would effect
> interrupts.  
> Do you know of any changes in kernel effecting interrupts?   I suspect
> that
> modules versus linked drivers into kernel would matter, or would it?

There are lots and lots of interrupt changes, some now in mainline, some
not.

There's a known-problematic PCI resource allocation bug now in mainline
too.  It appears that this can cause devices to not get assigned an
interrupt.

So yes, this is probably the trigger.  But as a secondary thing, it appears
that the driver will crash if something goes wrong with the interrupt
setup?


  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-02 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-02 23:21 Panic from mptspi_dv_renegotiate_work in 2.6.18-mm2 Moore, Eric
2006-10-02 23:37 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-10-03  0:32   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-03  0:41     ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-03  0:51       ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-03  1:35       ` Jeff Garzik
     [not found] <45217232.2010805@google.com>
2006-10-02 20:39 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061002163733.610a3c1f.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=Eric.Moore@lsil.com \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox