From: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@free.fr>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Linux-Kernel," <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"J.A. Magall??n" <jamagallon@ono.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pci_request_irq (was [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity)
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:09:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061002210949.GJ3003@slug> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061002181522.GL16272@parisc-linux.org>
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:15:22PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 08:00:48PM +0000, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > /**
> > + * pci_request_irq - Reserve an IRQ for a PCI device
> > + * @pdev: The PCI device whose irq is to be reserved
> > + * handler: The interrupt handler function,
>
> > + * pci_get_drvdata(pdev) shall be passed as an argument to that function
>
> I don't think you can (or should) do this. Move it to the body of the
> comment below.
OK, thanks for pointing this, will do.
>
> > + * @flags: The flags to be passed to request_irq()
> > + * @name: The name of the device to be associated with the irq
> > + *
> > + * Returns 0 on success, or a negative value on error. A warning
> > + * message is also printed on failure.
> > + */
> > +int pci_request_irq(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > + irqreturn_t (*handler)(int, void *, struct pt_regs *),
> > + unsigned long flags, const char *name)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > + const char *actual_name = name;
> > +
> > + rc = is_irq_valid(pdev->irq);
> > + if (!rc) {
> > + dev_printk(KERN_ERR, &pdev->dev, "invalid irq #%d\n", pdev->irq);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> Why is that more readable than
>
> if (!is_irq_valid(pdev->irq)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid irq #%d\n", pdev->irq);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
Better too.
> > + if (!actual_name)
> > + actual_name = pci_name(pdev);
> > +
> > + return request_irq(pdev->irq, handler, flags | IRQF_SHARED,
> > + actual_name, pci_get_drvdata(pdev));
>
> The driver name is a far more common usage than the pci_name.
>
> return request_irq(pdev->irq, handler, flags | IRQF_SHARED,
> name ? name : pdev->driver->name,
> pci_get_drvdata(pdev));
OK, thanks for the feedback,
Frederik
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-02 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060928014623.ccc9b885.akpm@osdl.org>
2006-09-29 13:57 ` 2.6.18-mm2 J.A. Magallón
2006-09-29 14:39 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-29 17:15 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Alan Cox
2006-09-29 23:50 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Frederik Deweerdt
2006-09-29 23:43 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Alan Cox
2006-09-30 14:09 ` [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2) Frederik Deweerdt
2006-09-30 14:19 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-30 13:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-30 23:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-01 14:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-01 19:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-01 19:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-01 19:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-01 19:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-01 19:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-02 2:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-02 20:00 ` [RFC PATCH] pci_request_irq (was [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity) Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:09 ` Frederik Deweerdt [this message]
2006-10-02 20:07 ` [RFC PATCH] move aic7xxx to pci_request_irq Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:02 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 3:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-02 20:11 ` [RFC PATCH] move tg3 " Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:04 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 7:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-02 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH] move drm " Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 18:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-02 21:07 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 20:36 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-02 22:26 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-02 23:54 ` Dave Airlie
2006-10-03 7:17 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 3:58 ` [RFC PATCH] pci_request_irq (was [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity) Randy Dunlap
2006-10-01 21:31 ` [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2) Frederik Deweerdt
2006-09-30 15:26 ` 2.6.18-mm2 James Bottomley
2006-09-30 16:21 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Matthew Wilcox
2006-09-30 17:20 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Mark Rustad
2006-09-30 20:54 ` 2.6.18-mm2 Alan Cox
2006-09-29 23:15 ` 2.6.18-mm2 J.A. Magallón
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061002210949.GJ3003@slug \
--to=deweerdt@free.fr \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=jamagallon@ono.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox