From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zfcp: convert the zfcp_erp thread to the kthread api
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:26:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061029222656.GB8494@osiris.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610271138.50201.swen@vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:38:49AM +0200, Swen Schillig wrote:
> commit fc26d0531e48a7361ac7e46ead4eec2a46774413
> Author: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> Date: Fri Oct 27 11:31:05 2006 +0200
>
> Convert the zfcp_erp thread to the kthread api. Also make zfcp_erp_thread_killdrivers
> return void since it cannot fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Would you mind reading Documentation/SubmittingPatches and
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt ?
Besides that this patch is broken and might lead to a deadlock. I think
somebody else tried already a similar approach and Christoph pointed out
that it could deadlock...
What could happen:
- code is in erp thread loop before down_interruptible(erp_ready_sem)
- thread should be killed: somebody calls kthread_stop() hence
kthread_should_stop() gets true. But since the thread is not sleeping
(yet) there is no need to wake it. So kthread_stop() just waits.
- erp thread comes to down_interruptible(erp_ready_sem) and sleeps.
- the only "up" that would wake up the erp_thread comes after your
kthread_stop() which is waits that the thread terminates -> deadlock.
For reference I quote the whole patch (Cornelia now on cc).
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
> index 74c0eac..d47a0d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
> @@ -605,8 +605,6 @@ #define ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_QDIOUP 0x00
> #define ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_REGISTERED 0x00000004
> #define ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_XCONFIG_OK 0x00000008
> #define ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_HOST_CON_INIT 0x00000010
> -#define ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_THREAD_UP 0x00000020
> -#define ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_THREAD_KILL 0x00000080
> #define ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_PENDING 0x00000100
> #define ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_LINK_UNPLUGGED 0x00000200
> #define ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_XPORT_OK 0x00000800
> @@ -900,6 +898,7 @@ struct zfcp_adapter {
> completion races */
> u16 status_read_failed; /* # failed status reads */
> atomic_t status; /* status of this adapter */
> + struct task_struct *erp_thread; /* error recovery thread */
> struct list_head erp_ready_head; /* error recovery for this
> adapter/devices */
> struct list_head erp_running_head;
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
> index c88babc..597104a 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #define ZFCP_LOG_AREA ZFCP_LOG_AREA_ERP
>
> #include "zfcp_ext.h"
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
>
> static int zfcp_erp_adisc(struct zfcp_port *);
> static void zfcp_erp_adisc_handler(unsigned long);
> @@ -991,24 +992,18 @@ static void zfcp_erp_action_dismiss(stru
> int
> zfcp_erp_thread_setup(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter)
> {
> - int retval = 0;
> -
> - atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_THREAD_UP, &adapter->status);
> -
> - retval = kernel_thread(zfcp_erp_thread, adapter, SIGCHLD);
> - if (retval < 0) {
> + adapter->erp_thread = kthread_run(zfcp_erp_thread, adapter, "zfcperp%s",
> + zfcp_get_busid_by_adapter(adapter));
> + if (IS_ERR(adapter->erp_thread)) {
> ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL("error: creation of erp thread failed for "
> "adapter %s\n",
> zfcp_get_busid_by_adapter(adapter));
> debug_text_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 5, "a_thset_fail");
> - } else {
> - wait_event(adapter->erp_thread_wqh,
> - atomic_test_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_THREAD_UP,
> - &adapter->status));
> + adapter->erp_thread = NULL;
> + } else
> debug_text_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 5, "a_thset_ok");
> - }
>
> - return (retval < 0);
> + return (!adapter->erp_thread);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1025,24 +1020,16 @@ zfcp_erp_thread_setup(struct zfcp_adapte
> * has been completed. Thus, there are no pending erp_actions
> * which would need to be handled here.
> */
> -int
> -zfcp_erp_thread_kill(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter)
> +void zfcp_erp_thread_kill(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter)
> {
> - int retval = 0;
> + struct task_struct *erp_thread;
>
> - atomic_set_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_THREAD_KILL, &adapter->status);
> + erp_thread = adapter->erp_thread;
> + adapter->erp_thread = NULL;
> + if (erp_thread)
> + kthread_stop(erp_thread);
> up(&adapter->erp_ready_sem);
> -
> - wait_event(adapter->erp_thread_wqh,
> - !atomic_test_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_THREAD_UP,
> - &adapter->status));
> -
> - atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_THREAD_KILL,
> - &adapter->status);
> -
> debug_text_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 5, "a_thki_ok");
> -
> - return retval;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1060,15 +1047,12 @@ zfcp_erp_thread(void *data)
> struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - daemonize("zfcperp%s", zfcp_get_busid_by_adapter(adapter));
> /* Block all signals */
> siginitsetinv(¤t->blocked, 0);
> - atomic_set_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_THREAD_UP, &adapter->status);
> debug_text_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 5, "a_th_run");
> wake_up(&adapter->erp_thread_wqh);
>
> - while (!atomic_test_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_THREAD_KILL,
> - &adapter->status)) {
> + while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
>
> write_lock_irqsave(&adapter->erp_lock, flags);
> next = adapter->erp_ready_head.prev;
> @@ -1093,7 +1077,6 @@ zfcp_erp_thread(void *data)
> debug_text_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 5, "a_th_woken");
> }
>
> - atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_THREAD_UP, &adapter->status);
> debug_text_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 5, "a_th_stop");
> wake_up(&adapter->erp_thread_wqh);
>
> @@ -2886,8 +2869,7 @@ zfcp_erp_action_enqueue(int action,
> * efficient.
> */
>
> - if (!atomic_test_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_ERP_THREAD_UP,
> - &adapter->status))
> + if (!adapter->erp_thread)
> return -EIO;
>
> debug_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 4, &action, sizeof (int));
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
> index b8794d7..aec24af 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ extern int zfcp_erp_unit_shutdown(struc
> extern void zfcp_erp_unit_failed(struct zfcp_unit *);
>
> extern int zfcp_erp_thread_setup(struct zfcp_adapter *);
> -extern int zfcp_erp_thread_kill(struct zfcp_adapter *);
> +extern void zfcp_erp_thread_kill(struct zfcp_adapter *);
> extern int zfcp_erp_wait(struct zfcp_adapter *);
> extern void zfcp_erp_async_handler(struct zfcp_erp_action *, unsigned long);
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-29 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-27 9:38 [PATCH] zfcp: convert the zfcp_erp thread to the kthread api Swen Schillig
2006-10-29 22:26 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2006-10-30 9:55 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061029222656.GB8494@osiris.ibm.com \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swen@vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox