From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken SCSI_SEAGATE driver
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:09:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061213000902.GD28443@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1165966274.5903.56.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 05:31:14PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 17:22 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The SCSI_SEAGATE driver has:
> > - already been marked as BROKEN in 2.6.0 three years ago and
> > - is still marked as BROKEN.
> >
> > Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long time seem to be
> > unlikely to be revived in the forseeable future.
> >
> > But if anyone wants to ever revive this driver, the code is still
> > present in the older kernel releases.
>
> Would you care to explain the rationale for this, please. If the driver
> had been riddled with errors and compilation problems, I might have
> acquiesced, but now I come to look it over, it seems structurally
> reasonably OK (we certainly have non-BROKEN worse ones) plus it compiles
> fine. So I'm wondering why it's marked broken in the first place.
>
> Since it was your original patch:
>
> Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
> Date: Mon Sep 1 19:22:52 2003 -0700
>
> [PATCH] Mark more drivers BROKEN{,ON_SMP}
>
> - let more drivers that don't compile depend on BROKEN
> - MTD_BLKMTD is fixed, remove the dependency on BROKEN
> - let all drivers that don't compile on SMP (due to cli/sti usage)
> depend on a BROKEN_ON_SMP that is only defined if !SMP || BROKEN
> - #include interrupt.h for dummy cli/sti/... in two files to fix the
> UP compilation of these files
>
> I marked only drivers that are broken for a long time and where I don't
> know about existing fixes with BROKEN or BROKEN_ON_SMP.
>
> I'd like to know why it was marked BROKEN in the first place.
There must have been a compile error that has since been fixed, but I
don't remember the details of this specific driver and I don't have
such old compile logs anymore.
> Thanks,
>
> James
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-13 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-12 16:22 [2.6 patch] remove the broken SCSI_SEAGATE driver Adrian Bunk
2006-12-12 23:31 ` James Bottomley
2006-12-13 0:09 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-12-15 13:34 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-12-15 14:05 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-15 16:00 ` James Bottomley
2006-12-17 20:03 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-12-17 20:22 ` James Bottomley
2006-12-17 21:18 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-12-18 8:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-18 13:48 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-12-18 15:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061213000902.GD28443@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox