public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Eric Moore <eric.moore@lsil.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] fusion: vmware bug fix prevent inifinite retries
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:10:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070106161017.GI24620@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1168097445.2792.53.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>

On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 09:30:45AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 20:46 -0700, Eric Moore wrote:
> > -			if (scsi_status == MPI_SCSI_STATUS_BUSY)
> > +			if (ioc->bus_type != SPI && scsi_status == MPI_SCSI_STATUS_BUSY)
> >  				sc->result = (DID_BUS_BUSY << 16) | scsi_status;
> >  			else
> >  				sc->result = (DID_OK << 16) | scsi_status;
> 
> DID_BUS_BUSY causes an immediate retry, but it does debit the retry
> count, so it shouldn't cause "infinite retries" ... if it does, there's
> something else wrong here.

I wonder if this is the same bug I'm chasing (on ia64 machines,
reproduced with both Montecito and Madison).  

The symptom is a stack overflow caused by this infinite loop:

generic_unplug_device
__generic_unplug_device
  scsi_request_fn [1]
  blk_requeue_request
  elv_requeue_request
  __elv_add_request
__generic_unplug_device
  scsi_request_fn [2]
  blk_requeue_request
  elv_requeue_request
  __elv_add_request
__generic_unplug_device
  scsi_request_fn [3]
  scsi_dispatch_cmd
  scsi_queue_insert
  blk_insert_request
  scsi_request_fn [4]
  blk_plug_device

(stack dump courtesy of incrementing a counter each time through
__generic_unplug_device and checking it in blk_plug_device() and
__generic_unplug_device)

I don't see how it happens; as far as I can tell, by the time we're
going to call blk_plug_device() in scsi_request_fn [4], there's no way
to unplug the queue again before it gets back to scsi_request_fn [3]
... and from the point where we call scsi_dispatch_cmd(), we immediately
either break or test blk_queue_plugged() and exit.  There should be no
way for it to call blk_requeue_request() again.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-06 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-05  3:46 [PATCH 2/5] fusion: vmware bug fix prevent inifinite retries Eric Moore
2007-01-06 15:30 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-06 16:10   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2007-01-06 16:28     ` James Bottomley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-08 22:03 Moore, Eric
2007-01-08 22:24 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-09  1:37 Moore, Eric
2007-01-09 16:17 ` Michael Reed
2007-01-09 17:49   ` Manon Goo
2007-01-09 18:14 Adam Zimman
2007-01-09 20:55 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-01-09 21:32   ` Edward Goggin
2007-01-10 16:10     ` James Bottomley
2007-01-10 16:44       ` Edward Goggin
2007-01-10  5:44 Moore, Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070106161017.GI24620@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=eric.moore@lsil.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox