From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: qla_wxyz pci_set_mwi question Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:04:38 -0600 Message-ID: <20070412200438.GM26692@parisc-linux.org> References: <20070411221507.69c97257.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20070412172038.GG10124@andrew-vasquezs-computer.local> <20070412185347.GL26692@parisc-linux.org> <20070412193713.GB14510@andrew-vasquezs-computer.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:58181 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030307AbXDLUEk (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:04:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070412193713.GB14510@andrew-vasquezs-computer.local> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Vasquez Cc: Randy Dunlap , David Somayajulu , scsi , PCI , linux-driver@qlogic.com, gregkh , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:37:13PM -0700, Andrew Vasquez wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Why should it fail? If there's a platform which can't support a > > cacheline size that the qla2xyz card can handle, it should be able to > > happily fall back to doing plain writes instead of MWIs. IMO, it should > > just call pci_set_mwi() and ignore the result. > > I believe there were some erratas on some ISP2xxx chips where MWI > needed to be set for proper operation. I'll go back, verify and > update the patch accordingly. Hmm. The thing is that pci_set_mwi() returns success on machines where MWI is disabled (currently only PPC64). Perhaps it needs to fail instead.