From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070416.164111.32625690.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20070416222517.GD14351@andrew-vasquezs-computer.local> <20070416.152910.107940079.davem@davemloft.net> <20070416232851.GA15840@dmccrory-d810.qlogic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56893 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031027AbXDPXlJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:41:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070416232851.GA15840@dmccrory-d810.qlogic.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, ema@debian.org From: Andrew Vasquez Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:28:51 -0700 > Sorry, but let's be realistic, this type of warning would have > *NEVER* been addressed if we kept the status quo Wrong. I watch the logs all the time and would have sent you a fix to use the Sparc firmware info as soon as I saw the kernel log message. Anyone who has worked with me over the last 15 years will let you know emphatically that this is true. AND IN THE MEAN TIME I COULD GET WORK DONE AND MY SYSTEM WOULD BOOT!