From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:02:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070416.220208.94071670.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20070416234705.GA15937@dmccrory-d810.qlogic.org> <20070416.170504.02298047.davem@davemloft.net> <20070417024107.GE16469@dmccrory-d810.qlogic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57893 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753918AbXDQFCH (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:02:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070417024107.GE16469@dmccrory-d810.qlogic.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com Cc: seokmann.ju@qlogic.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, ema@debian.org From: Andrew Vasquez Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:41:07 -0700 > That verbiage sounds fine -- so would you consider the previous patch > I submitted (with module parameter) along with the wording above? Yes, that sounds fine. > I'm in transit for a redeye to NY so I won't be able to modify the > patch, If you would be amenable to the above, Seokmann, could you > rework the patch? Thanks guys.