From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:16:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20070418171632.GB16471@infradead.org> References: <20070416.220208.94071670.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:38178 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992885AbXDRRQf (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:16:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Seokmann Ju Cc: David Miller , Andrew Vasquez , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, ema@debian.org On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:28:07AM -0700, Seokmann Ju wrote: > Hello David, > On Mon 4/16/2007 10:02 PM, David Miller wrote: > > > I'm in transit for a redeye to NY so I won't be able to modify the > > > patch, If you would be amenable to the above, Seokmann, could you > > > rework the patch? > > > > Thanks guys. > Here, I've attached updated patch. Please take this. > Sorry for late. I don't think there should be a warning in the sparc case where the wwn's are stored in the device tree. This is the way sun intended the hardware to work on sparc.