From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH] add two SCSI command opcodes Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:49:53 -0600 Message-ID: <20070419164952.GA19438@parisc-linux.org> References: <20070419151053.GA10199@localdomain> <20070419154743.GA18325@lug-owl.de> <20070419163959.GA25595@localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:38653 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1766868AbXDSQty (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:49:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070419163959.GA25595@localdomain> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Aloni Cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw , Linux Kernel List , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:39:59PM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > Where's the user? > > A privately maintained kernel driver. > > Do we _must_ have in-tree users? I'd consider the change for completion's > sake. I agree with Dan -- if they're published in a SCSI spec, we should include them in this header file.