From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: bidi bsg is non-blocking Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 15:00:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20070508130032.GJ4163@kernel.dk> References: <20070508162326Q.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20070508163138G.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20070508122134.GI4163@kernel.dk> <20070508215620M.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:34812 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967397AbXEHNCq (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 09:02:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070508215620M.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: Daniel.E.Messinger@seagate.com, tomof@acm.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 08 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > BTW, any comments on the bidi patch for the block layer? Yeah it looks much better. I agree with your notion that bidi should be block layer agnostic at least for now (until a general use comes up), it's just a way to transport these commands. And I do still prefer ->next_rq as the pointer name for partly those reasons. -- Jens Axboe