From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Proposals to change the way all drivers work with SCSI commands
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:00:24 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070511.130024.104034874.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178908422.3692.58.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:33:41 -0500
> Right at the moment, we're planning to clean up the way SCSI drivers
> process commands. The proposals are essentially:
>
> 1. Get rid of the now unnecessary map_single path (every command is
> either zero transfer or scatter/gather)
> 2. use accessors to manipulate the SG lists (mainly so that we can
> alter the implementation without affecting the drivers)
>
> It strikes me that in all of this, we could also consider doing the DMA
> mapping inside the mid layer (instead of in every driver). This is
> essentially what libata is already doing ... leading to confusion in
> SCSI drivers that use libata for SATA.
>
> So what do people think about this?
This would require platforms to handle all of their bus types
behind the generic dma_*() and that's isn't true everywhere yet.
For example, SBUS still requires explicitly using sbus_map_sg() etc.
I plan to fix that of course, but we're not there now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-11 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 18:33 Proposals to change the way all drivers work with SCSI commands James Bottomley
2007-05-11 18:42 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-05-11 19:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-11 19:49 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-11 20:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-11 20:00 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-05-11 21:12 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-11 21:21 ` David Miller
2007-05-11 21:36 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-11 21:47 ` David Miller
2007-05-11 21:52 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-11 21:20 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-11 21:30 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2007-05-11 21:58 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-12 6:35 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2007-05-12 9:12 ` Heiko Carstens
2007-05-12 13:04 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-12 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-12 15:50 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-12 15:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070511.130024.104034874.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox