From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:24:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20070517182414.GA12170@infradead.org> References: <17841.simon.1179228389@5ec7c279.invalid> <20070515120228.GI10562@parisc-linux.org> <4649E03A.1090004@simon.arlott.org.uk> <20070515172905.GJ10562@parisc-linux.org> <20070516025121.GK10562@parisc-linux.org> <20070517172023.GL10562@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Satyam Sharma Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Simon Arlott , James Bottomley , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-packagers@vger.kernel.org, "Robert P. J. Day" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:11:10PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > Another command to /proc/scsi/scsi isn't a bad thought at all, considering Yes it is. /proc/scsi/scsi is a horrible interface and deprecated since the start of the 2.6 series.