From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Salyzyn,
Mark" <mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com>,
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 14/25] SCSI: use irq_handler_t where appropriate
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:17:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070524081720.5675ad5d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1180015447.3692.6.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:04:06 -0500 James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 01:51 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > James Bottomley wrote:
> > > It's not a bug fix or even an enhancement. Historically, it is quite
> > > difficult to get maintainers to ack these ... particularly if you don't
> > > cc them.
> >
> > If neither you nor the maintainers are reading and responding to patches
> > sent to linux-scsi, I don't think the problem is sitting in my chair.
>
> Oh come off it ... You've been around long enough to know that
> maintainers are not always watching everything ... it would be nice if
> they were, but to give a patch the best shot at review, you try to
> attract their attention. Specifically, in this case, you should cc the
> maintainers and you should have a subject line explaining that you are
> modifying their driver. It is very easy to ignore a patch that's simply
> waved at the SCSI list with a generic subject line.
I can understand subsystem maintainers ignoring lkml, but ignoring
the subsystem mailing list makes no sense to me, especially if the
subject contains "[PATCH]".
> > If others have SCSI patches that have been sitting in limbo for weeks or
> > months, send them to me, and I'll queue them in misc-2.6.git#scsi.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-24 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-23 21:41 [patch 14/25] SCSI: use irq_handler_t where appropriate akpm
2007-05-23 22:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-23 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-23 22:55 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-24 5:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-24 14:04 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-24 14:28 ` Salyzyn, Mark
2007-05-24 15:21 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-26 20:45 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-24 15:17 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2007-05-24 15:28 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-24 20:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-25 9:32 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-25 9:06 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-24 20:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-24 13:32 ` Salyzyn, Mark
2007-05-23 23:00 ` David Miller
2007-05-24 11:31 ` Andrew Vasquez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070524081720.5675ad5d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox