RE: [patch 14/25] SCSI: use irq_handler_t where appropriate

Salyzyn, Mark
2007-05-24T13:33:01Z

I ACK the portion that resides in aacraid.h, and will track and push it
in the future if it does not stick ;->

I will comment for any dpt_i2o, ips or aacraid patches posted to the
SCSI list from submissions from folks not working at Adaptec once unit
tested, accepted into the Adaptec upstreamed source or code inspected;
as a matter of form. There will be no *requirement* to cc my maintainer
address.

Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 6:55 PM
> To: Jeff Garzik
> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
> Salyzyn, Mark; Andrew Vasquez
> Subject: Re: [patch 14/25] SCSI: use irq_handler_t where appropriate
>
>
> On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 18:07 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> > > From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/scsi/aacraid/aacraid.h | 2 +-
> > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_isr.c | 2 +-
> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > hrm. This appears to have been sent to linux-scsi at least
> three times.
> >
> > If it doesn't stick, I'll go ahead and send it up myself.
>
> It's not a bug fix or even an enhancement. Historically, it is quite
> difficult to get maintainers to ack these ... particularly if
> you don't
> cc them.
>
> James
>
>
>