From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: [PATCH] add help to WAIT_SCAN option Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:53:56 -0600 Message-ID: <20070527005356.GD31023@colo.lackof.org> References: <20070526191127.GB7080@colo.lackof.org> <1180209014.3712.69.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <20070527000637.GB31023@colo.lackof.org> <1180224943.3712.84.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <20070527002710.GR5798@parisc-linux.org> <1180225770.3712.87.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <20070527003308.GS5798@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from colo.lackof.org ([198.49.126.79]:50244 "EHLO colo.lackof.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750910AbXE0AyF (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2007 20:54:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070527003308.GS5798@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: James Bottomley , Grant Grundler , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Thibaut VARENE On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:33:10PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 07:29:30PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > Er .. I think you misunderstood the email. Grant asked why Hugh's (not > > Grant's) patch was wrong and I said that on reflection it wasn't. > > Oh, right. Since Hugh's patch is the same as the one I sent in the > other fork of this thread, except for the contents of the comment, by > all means put in Hugh's version instead of mine. Include my signed-off > if you like. And you can add an "Acked-by: Grant Grundler " since I prodded you to reconsider the patch. :) thanks, grant