From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/21] advansys: Move to scsi hotplug initialisation model Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:29:34 -0600 Message-ID: <20070726182933.GK19275@parisc-linux.org> References: <20070726171141.GE19275@parisc-linux.org> <11854705779-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <20070726180112.GA3392@infradead.org> <20070726180446.GI19275@parisc-linux.org> <20070726180617.GJ19275@parisc-linux.org> <46A8E4FB.8040908@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:47760 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751495AbXGZS3f (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:29:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46A8E4FB.8040908@garzik.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 02:16:27PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > In that case, reverse what I said: the above pci_register_driver commit > breaks non-PCI probing. Ah yes. Fair point. > advansys_detect/release populate legacy list, but nothing ever happens > from there... your "Move to scsi hotplug initialisation model" patch > fixes this bug, I presume. Looks like it. I don't know of any testers with non-PCI cards though. Anyone out there with a non-PCI advansys card want to do some testing for me? -- "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."