From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: FUJITA Tomonori Subject: RE: [PATCH] microtek: convert to use the data buffer accessors Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:12:41 +0900 Message-ID: <20070811153044Z.tomof@acm.org> References: <20070811072657A.tomof@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mo11.iij4u.or.jp ([210.138.174.79]:40104 "EHLO mo11.iij4u.or.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936511AbXHLPNi (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:13:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: bharrosh@panasas.com Cc: tomof@acm.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, greg@kroah.com, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:01:20 -0400 "Harrosh, Boaz" wrote: > FUJITA Tomonori wrote ... > > Subject: [PATCH] microtek: convert to use the data buffer accessors > > > > - remove the unnecessary map_single path. > > > > - convert to use the new accessors for the sg lists and the > > parameters. > > > > TODO: sg chaining support > > > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori > > Is this not the same as the patch I sent at 2007-07-12 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=118424592500438&w=4 > > And was ACKed by one of the maintainers: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=118426360825803&w=4 > Oops, I didn't realized that. Isn't the patch in scsi-misc, scsi-pending, or scsi-fixes?