public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6][RESEND] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:21:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708130021.07068.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708130016.11281.jesper.juhl@gmail.com>

(previously send on 09-Aug-2007 20:47)

Hi,

The Coverity checker noticed that we may overrun a statically allocated 
array in drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c::lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find().

The case is this; In 'struct lpfc_hba' we have 

	#define LPFC_MAX_HBQS  4
	...
	struct lpfc_hba {
		...
		struct hbq_s hbqs[LPFC_MAX_HBQS];
		...
	};

But then in lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find() we have this code 

	hbqno = tag >> 16;
	if (hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
		return NULL;

if 'hbqno' ends up as exactely 4, then we won't return, and then this

	list_for_each_entry(d_buf, &phba->hbqs[hbqno].hbq_buffer_list, list) {

will cause an overflow of the statically allocated array at index 4, 
since the valid indices are only 0-3. 

I propose this patch, that simply changes the 'hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS' 
into 'hbqno >= LPFC_MAX_HBQS' as a possible fix.


Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Acked-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
---

 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index ce5ff2b..e5337ad 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint32_t tag)
 	uint32_t hbqno;
 
 	hbqno = tag >> 16;
-	if (hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
+	if (hbqno >= LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
 		return NULL;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(d_buf, &phba->hbqs[hbqno].hbq_buffer_list, list) {




       reply	other threads:[~2007-08-12 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200708130016.11281.jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
2007-08-12 22:21 ` Jesper Juhl [this message]
2007-08-13 10:56   ` [PATCH 4/6][RESEND] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array James Smart
2007-08-13 11:15     ` Jesper Juhl
2007-08-13 13:10       ` James Smart
2007-08-13 15:01         ` Jesper Juhl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200708130021.07068.jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox