From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6][RESEND] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:21:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708130021.07068.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708130016.11281.jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
(previously send on 09-Aug-2007 20:47)
Hi,
The Coverity checker noticed that we may overrun a statically allocated
array in drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c::lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find().
The case is this; In 'struct lpfc_hba' we have
#define LPFC_MAX_HBQS 4
...
struct lpfc_hba {
...
struct hbq_s hbqs[LPFC_MAX_HBQS];
...
};
But then in lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find() we have this code
hbqno = tag >> 16;
if (hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
return NULL;
if 'hbqno' ends up as exactely 4, then we won't return, and then this
list_for_each_entry(d_buf, &phba->hbqs[hbqno].hbq_buffer_list, list) {
will cause an overflow of the statically allocated array at index 4,
since the valid indices are only 0-3.
I propose this patch, that simply changes the 'hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS'
into 'hbqno >= LPFC_MAX_HBQS' as a possible fix.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Acked-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index ce5ff2b..e5337ad 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint32_t tag)
uint32_t hbqno;
hbqno = tag >> 16;
- if (hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
+ if (hbqno >= LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
return NULL;
list_for_each_entry(d_buf, &phba->hbqs[hbqno].hbq_buffer_list, list) {
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-12 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200708130016.11281.jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
2007-08-12 22:21 ` Jesper Juhl [this message]
2007-08-13 10:56 ` [PATCH 4/6][RESEND] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array James Smart
2007-08-13 11:15 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-08-13 13:10 ` James Smart
2007-08-13 15:01 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708130021.07068.jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox