From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc3 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 05:24:30 -0600 Message-ID: <20070814112429.GL16277@parisc-linux.org> References: <46C1717E.3030908@linpro.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:60387 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751866AbXHNLYb (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:24:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46C1717E.3030908@linpro.no> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Tore Anderson Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James.Smart@Emulex.Com On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 11:10:22AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: > I gave it a spin, and got quite a few troubles that appears related to > the lpfc driver. I don't know if these problems happened due to the > recent update as the latest kernel I ran before was 2.6.20 (where I > never saw problems like these). First I see that something failed when > the volumes on the SAN (on a Sun StorageTek 6140 / Engenio 3994) is > registered, causing two errors errors such as: You didn't seem to include your .config, but I assume you're using async scanning. Could you try including this patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=118289275414202&w=2 -- "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."