From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] libata: remove blk_queue_max_phys_segments Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:29:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20070903102943.GN4253@kernel.dk> References: <20070903103519T.tomof@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([87.55.233.238]:12915 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751363AbXICKeF (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2007 06:34:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070903103519T.tomof@acm.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp On Mon, Sep 03 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Jeff, can I get your ACK on this patch? > > Whatever in a request queue we set, iommu code ignores all the sg list > limitations. It has my ack, libata should not fiddle with the physical segment setting, since it's not managing the (non-hardware) side of the sg table. -- Jens Axboe