From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Matthew Dharm <mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Refactoring scsi_error to facilitate in synchronous REQUEST_SENSE
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:12:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070910151258.GA16802@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46E55378.1090600@panasas.com>
> +void scsi_eh_prep_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd,
> + struct scsi_eh_save_cmnd_info *sesci, unsigned char *cmnd,
> + int cmnd_size, int copy_sense)
I think just struct "struct scsi_eh_save *save" is descriptive enough and
almost fits on a line as well.. Also continuation of the prototype
is indented by two tabs normally.
> +struct scsi_eh_save_cmnd_info {
> + int old_result;
> + enum dma_data_direction old_data_direction;
> + unsigned char old_cmd_len;
> + unsigned char old_cmnd[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
> +
> + void* old_buffer;
void *old_buffer;
> + unsigned old_bufflen;
> + unsigned short old_use_sg;
> + int old_resid;
> +
> + struct scatterlist sense_sgl;
> +};
I think you can kill the old prefixes in the struct, they're saved
per defintion.
Except for these cosmetic details the patch looks fine to me,
thanks a lot!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-10 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-10 14:11 [patchset 0/5] Refactoring scsi_error to facilitate in synchronous REQUEST_SENSE Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] scsi_error: code cleanup before refactoring of scsi_send_eh_cmnd() Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 14:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] Refactoring scsi_error to facilitate in synchronous REQUEST_SENSE Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 15:12 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2007-09-10 15:19 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-10 14:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] usb: transport.c use scsi_eh API in REQUEST_SENSE execution Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 14:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] NCR5380: Use scsi_eh API for REQUEST_SENSE invocation Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 14:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm: fas216 " Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 15:58 ` [patchset 0/5] Refactoring scsi_error to facilitate in synchronous REQUEST_SENSE Alan Stern
2007-09-10 17:03 ` Matthew Dharm
2007-09-10 17:09 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070910151258.GA16802@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox