From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Dharm Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/24] libata-scsi: convert to use the data buffer accessors Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:40:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20070912014046.GB14439@one-eyed-alien.net> References: <46E6F92D.2090409@panasas.com> <46E72B8D.1080508@panasas.com> <46E72E4F.9020508@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R" Return-path: Received: from adsl-67-113-118-6.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net ([67.113.118.6]:39687 "EHLO multivac.one-eyed-alien.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764075AbXILBmD (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:42:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46E72E4F.9020508@garzik.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Boaz Harrosh , James Bottomley , FUJITA Tomonori , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , YOKOTA Hiroshi , linux-scsi , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Mark Fortescue --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 08:09:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I would much rather see the !use_sg cleanup in a separate patch series... Are we really sure this can all go? No requests, not even ones from SG_IO will ever use the non-sg paths? Matt --=20 Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.= net=20 Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver I could always suspend a few hundred accounts and watch what happens. -- Tanya User Friendly, 7/31/1998 --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG50OeHL9iwnUZqnkRAkeoAJ9JZBs9KITGzESzCVraGH9mCaJy4ACgj+mm 8WYEgIAQbTymvImoQNbIiHw= =WhZ/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R--