From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [patchset 0/24] Lots of the Accessors patches and !use_sg cleanup Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:05:35 +0200 Message-ID: <200709172205.36070.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <46E6F92D.2090409@panasas.com> <200709171246.15142.bzolnier@gmail.com> <1190037090.3386.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:1755 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755333AbXIQUDS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:03:18 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so8129ugc for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:03:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1190037090.3386.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Boaz Harrosh , FUJITA Tomonori , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , Matthew Dharm , Russell King , Jeff Garzik , "David S. Miller" , YOKOTA Hiroshi , linux-scsi , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Mark Fortescue , osst@riede.org On Monday 17 September 2007, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:46 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > 0024 drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c - Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > > > > > This reminds me that ide-scsi needs a real Maintainer, I don't have a > > time to > > closely follow-up SCSI changes... > > Er, well, I thought it had been dead for some time ... we decided its >>From looking at git log output I suspect that it has been dead since October 2006 (but I hasn't verified this yet so I may be wrong). > many bugs were virtually unfixable in 2.5. Willem Riede > had been trying to keep it working with chewing gum and > bailing wire for the onstream tape unit. Yes, osst driver seems to be the main user of ide-scsi nowadays, other ATAPI devices has (better) native IDE support... > Realistically (and I hate myself for saying this) libata-pata does > provide a much better alternative for the ATAPI devices. Is it just > time to recognise the inevitable and kill ide-scsi? Agreed, libata-pata is a much better version of ide-scsi. ;-) If there is general consensus about ide-scsi removal I think that we should start with disabling ide-scsi Kconfig entry in 2.6.24 to later remove the ide-scsi driver completely in 2.6.25. Bart