From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] more gdth patches for your amusement Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:22:41 -0600 Message-ID: <20070925122241.GS10625@parisc-linux.org> References: <20070721203410.GA1004@havoc.gtf.org> <1189865576.3339.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46F85578.70503@garzik.org> <20070925082027.GA9587@infradead.org> <46F8DA11.6030103@panasas.com> <20070925115608.GR10625@parisc-linux.org> <46F8FC68.4020002@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:44137 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752668AbXIYMWm (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:22:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46F8FC68.4020002@panasas.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Garzik , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, achim_leubner@adaptec.com, Andrew Morton On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 02:17:44PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > This patch looks grate, Thanks. It is very good for the direction > I'm going to. However it does have a smallish conflict with One > of Jeff's patches where he completely removes the 2.4.x support. > > If it is OK with you I will add your patch to my patchset with your > Singed-off-by, minus the conflict? That's absolutely fine; the fewer patches I have to track, the better. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."