From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24 Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:38:27 -0600 Message-ID: <20070926033827.GB3899@parisc-linux.org> References: <1190768402.8707.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070925065233Q.tomof@acm.org> <1190770955.8707.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070925073735U.tomof@acm.org> <46F9C5ED.6050505@garzik.org> <20070926025608.GA3899@parisc-linux.org> <46F9D328.4030801@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46F9D328.4030801@garzik.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:34:00PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Well, sure, the driver is the owner of that memory. > > We're talking about common code. > > If everybody agrees SHT is R/W in the core, Fujita-san's patch is fine. Oh ... harder to find, but scsi_module.c does that, as does scsi_register/scsi_unregister. OK, those are legacy, but they still exist today. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."