* Re: /dev/sda with 8 byte offset [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709262121040.17048@valhalla.fs.tum.de> @ 2007-09-26 20:55 ` Stefan Richter 2007-09-26 21:03 ` Al Viro 2007-09-27 19:48 ` Stefan Rutzinger 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Stefan Richter @ 2007-09-26 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Rutzinger; +Cc: linux1394-user, linux-scsi (Adding Cc: linux-scsi) Stefan Rutzinger wrote: > I experience a very weird offset in the data from my FW disk. It worked > well last time i used it, which is about half a year ago. Unfortunately i > can't tell what exactly changed in the meanwhile, i continued updating > debian testing an think (but am not sure) changed the kernel. However, > this seems to be a real bug which should not be there anyway. > > So, the disk is a USB / firewire disk. It still works fine with USB in > linux and with USB + firewire in Win XP. So the hardware is certainly > still fine. > > But with firewire and linux, there is this problem: > > It't still detected with correct disk geometry and /dev/sda and /dev/sda1 > are recognised. But fdisk -l /dev/sda fails: "Disk /dev/sda doesn't > contain a valid partition table" > > I dd'ed the mbr to a file, once when connected by USB and once when > connected to Firewire and found out with cmp: > > The data in /dev/sda and /dev/sda1 are shifted by an offset of 8 byte in > the firewire case. I.e. there are some additional 8 byte at the beginning > of /dev/sda and /dev/sda1 which should not be there. Have a look at the > cmp output below. Of course fdisk fails then. Strange. I haven't heard of this before. From which vendor and model is the device, and do you know which chip is on its IDE bridge board? Did you ever install new firmware on the device? > Who can help out? > > > Here' some debugging data: > > I tried debian pre-compiled kernel 2.6.15-1-686-smp and 2.6.21-2-686. > > stefaniello:~# cmp -bln16 usb-sda1 ieee-sda1 > 1 353 M-k 40 - > 2 130 X 123 S | > 3 220 M-^P 131 Y | > 4 115 M 123 S | > 5 123 S 0 ^@ | > 6 127 W 0 ^@ | > 7 111 I 125 U | > 8 116 N 252 M-* | > 9 64 4 353 M-k -- -> 8 byte offset ! > 10 56 . 130 X > 11 61 1 220 M-^P > 12 0 ^@ 115 M > 13 2 ^B 123 S > 14 100 @ 127 W > 15 46 & 111 I > 16 0 ^@ 116 N > > USB connected: > stefaniello:~# tail /var/log/messages > Sep 20 19:30:47 stefaniello kernel: usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 > Sep 20 19:30:47 stefaniello kernel: scsi0 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices > Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: Vendor: WDC WD20 Model: 00JB-00GVA0 Rev: 08.0 > Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00 > Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: SCSI device sda: 390721969 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) > Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: SCSI device sda: 390721969 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) > Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: sda: sda1 > Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda > Sep 20 19:30:53 stefaniello kernel: sda: Current: sense key: No Sense > Sep 20 19:30:53 stefaniello kernel: Additional sense: No additional sense information > > stefaniello:~# fdisk -l /dev/sda > Disk /dev/sda: 200.0 GB, 200049648128 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24321 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sda1 1 24321 195358401 b W95 FAT32 > > > ieee1394 connected: > > stefaniello:~# tail -f /var/log/messages > Sep 20 19:42:04 stefaniello kernel: scsi1 : SCSI emulation for IEEE-1394 SBP-2 Devices (This was obviously obtained from Debian's 2.6.15.) > Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: Logged into SBP-2 device > Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: Vendor: WDC WD20 Model: 00JB-00GVA0 Rev: > Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: Type: Direct-Access-RBC ANSI SCSI revision: 04 > Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: SCSI device sda: 390721968 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) > Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: SCSI device sda: 390721968 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) > Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: sda: sda1 > Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda > > stefaniello:~# fdisk -l /dev/sda > Disk /dev/sda: 200.0 GB, 200049647616 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24321 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > > Disk /dev/sda doesn't contain a valid partition table I don't know what could cause this. The sbp2 driver did a lot of SCSI command conversions between the RBC and SBC command sets in older kernels, and this was gradually pulled out of sbp2 because the sd driver already handled RBC properly at some point. In Linux 2.6.15, sbp2 had still all this conversion code but it was AFAIK already deadwood. However I don't know if there could really be differences in how very old kernels sent SCSI commands which could cause the device to return data with an offset. Perhaps the problem is not in what data the device returns when sd reads from it, but in where the data is written into buffers. I.e. if going through sbp2, the data might be written 8 bytes behind the actual start of the data buffer. I will check in the SBP-2 spec if there is anything that could be mistaken about the buffer address. By the way, in addition to the 8 bytes offset which you found, there is also a difference in the reported disk size. The USB firmware says 390721969 sectors, the FireWire firmware says 390721968 sectors. The USB firmware's value seems to be the wrong one. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== =--= ==-=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: /dev/sda with 8 byte offset 2007-09-26 20:55 ` /dev/sda with 8 byte offset Stefan Richter @ 2007-09-26 21:03 ` Al Viro 2007-09-27 6:45 ` Stefan Richter 2007-09-27 19:48 ` Stefan Rutzinger 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Al Viro @ 2007-09-26 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Richter; +Cc: linux-scsi, linux1394-user On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:55:11PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > Strange. I haven't heard of this before. From which vendor and model > is the device, and do you know which chip is on its IDE bridge board? I've seen it, all right. 8 bytes stuck in FIFO, pl3507 IDE bridge, and judging by google search that turd is b0rken regardless of the OS (along the lines of "works under Windows if you power-cycle it once in about half an hour"). Suggested fix: use as a barf-bag; the authors of that thing certainly had done that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: /dev/sda with 8 byte offset 2007-09-26 21:03 ` Al Viro @ 2007-09-27 6:45 ` Stefan Richter 2007-09-27 7:42 ` Al Viro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Stefan Richter @ 2007-09-27 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Al Viro; +Cc: linux-scsi, linux1394-user Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:55:11PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: >> Strange. I haven't heard of this before. From which vendor and model >> is the device, and do you know which chip is on its IDE bridge board? > > I've seen it, all right. 8 bytes stuck in FIFO, pl3507 IDE bridge, > and judging by google search that turd is b0rken regardless of the > OS (along the lines of "works under Windows if you power-cycle it > once in about half an hour"). > > Suggested fix: use as a barf-bag; the authors of that thing certainly had > done that. Sounds plausible. I wasn't aware of the particular 8-byte-garbage symptom (or heard of it and forgot it). Some people (regardless if Windows, OS X, or Linux users) were able to make their PL3507 work with new firmware: http://wiki.linux1394.org/FirmwareDownload Very old revisions of the chip don't support firmware upload. And some boards with newer revisions apparently prevent firmware upload with a resistor: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?p=957178 -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== =--= ==-== http://arcgraph.de/sr/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: /dev/sda with 8 byte offset 2007-09-27 6:45 ` Stefan Richter @ 2007-09-27 7:42 ` Al Viro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Al Viro @ 2007-09-27 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Richter; +Cc: linux-scsi, linux1394-user On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 08:45:09AM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > Al Viro wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:55:11PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > >> Strange. I haven't heard of this before. From which vendor and model > >> is the device, and do you know which chip is on its IDE bridge board? > > > > I've seen it, all right. 8 bytes stuck in FIFO, pl3507 IDE bridge, > > and judging by google search that turd is b0rken regardless of the > > OS (along the lines of "works under Windows if you power-cycle it > > once in about half an hour"). > > > > Suggested fix: use as a barf-bag; the authors of that thing certainly had > > done that. > > Sounds plausible. I wasn't aware of the particular 8-byte-garbage > symptom (or heard of it and forgot it). IIRC, it can be triggered by the second INQUIRY during the same firewire session (i.e. device survives only one INQUIRY after login and using e.g. scsiinfo -i afterwards triggers that behaviour). Can't verify that, since the hardware in question had been met its end (after a week spent debugging that mess). It was of the "can't upgrade the firmware" variety and frankly, it's easier to spend $20 on a working enclosure than to waste time on that dreck. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: /dev/sda with 8 byte offset 2007-09-26 20:55 ` /dev/sda with 8 byte offset Stefan Richter 2007-09-26 21:03 ` Al Viro @ 2007-09-27 19:48 ` Stefan Rutzinger 2007-09-29 11:31 ` Stefan Richter 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Stefan Rutzinger @ 2007-09-27 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux1394-user; +Cc: linux-scsi On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Stefan Richter wrote: > (Adding Cc: linux-scsi) > > Stefan Rutzinger wrote: >> I experience a very weird offset in the data from my FW disk. It worked >> well last time i used it, which is about half a year ago. Unfortunately i >> can't tell what exactly changed in the meanwhile, i continued updating >> debian testing an think (but am not sure) changed the kernel. However, >> this seems to be a real bug which should not be there anyway. >> >> So, the disk is a USB / firewire disk. It still works fine with USB in >> linux and with USB + firewire in Win XP. So the hardware is certainly >> still fine. >> >> But with firewire and linux, there is this problem: >> >> It't still detected with correct disk geometry and /dev/sda and /dev/sda1 >> are recognised. But fdisk -l /dev/sda fails: "Disk /dev/sda doesn't >> contain a valid partition table" >> >> I dd'ed the mbr to a file, once when connected by USB and once when >> connected to Firewire and found out with cmp: >> >> The data in /dev/sda and /dev/sda1 are shifted by an offset of 8 byte in >> the firewire case. I.e. there are some additional 8 byte at the beginning >> of /dev/sda and /dev/sda1 which should not be there. Have a look at the >> cmp output below. Of course fdisk fails then. > > Strange. I haven't heard of this before. From which vendor and model > is the device, and do you know which chip is on its IDE bridge board? > > Did you ever install new firmware on the device? > >> Who can help out? >> >> >> Here' some debugging data: >> >> I tried debian pre-compiled kernel 2.6.15-1-686-smp and 2.6.21-2-686. >> >> stefaniello:~# cmp -bln16 usb-sda1 ieee-sda1 >> 1 353 M-k 40 - >> 2 130 X 123 S | >> 3 220 M-^P 131 Y | >> 4 115 M 123 S | >> 5 123 S 0 ^@ | >> 6 127 W 0 ^@ | >> 7 111 I 125 U | >> 8 116 N 252 M-* | >> 9 64 4 353 M-k -- -> 8 byte offset ! >> 10 56 . 130 X >> 11 61 1 220 M-^P >> 12 0 ^@ 115 M >> 13 2 ^B 123 S >> 14 100 @ 127 W >> 15 46 & 111 I >> 16 0 ^@ 116 N >> >> USB connected: >> stefaniello:~# tail /var/log/messages >> Sep 20 19:30:47 stefaniello kernel: usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 >> Sep 20 19:30:47 stefaniello kernel: scsi0 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices >> Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: Vendor: WDC WD20 Model: 00JB-00GVA0 Rev: 08.0 >> Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00 >> Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: SCSI device sda: 390721969 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) >> Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: SCSI device sda: 390721969 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) >> Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: sda: sda1 >> Sep 20 19:30:52 stefaniello kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda >> Sep 20 19:30:53 stefaniello kernel: sda: Current: sense key: No Sense >> Sep 20 19:30:53 stefaniello kernel: Additional sense: No additional sense information >> >> stefaniello:~# fdisk -l /dev/sda >> Disk /dev/sda: 200.0 GB, 200049648128 bytes >> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24321 cylinders >> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes >> >> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System >> /dev/sda1 1 24321 195358401 b W95 FAT32 >> >> >> ieee1394 connected: >> >> stefaniello:~# tail -f /var/log/messages >> Sep 20 19:42:04 stefaniello kernel: scsi1 : SCSI emulation for IEEE-1394 SBP-2 Devices > > (This was obviously obtained from Debian's 2.6.15.) > >> Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: Logged into SBP-2 device >> Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: Vendor: WDC WD20 Model: 00JB-00GVA0 Rev: >> Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: Type: Direct-Access-RBC ANSI SCSI revision: 04 >> Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: SCSI device sda: 390721968 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) >> Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: SCSI device sda: 390721968 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) >> Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: sda: sda1 >> Sep 20 19:42:05 stefaniello kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda >> >> stefaniello:~# fdisk -l /dev/sda >> Disk /dev/sda: 200.0 GB, 200049647616 bytes >> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24321 cylinders >> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes >> >> Disk /dev/sda doesn't contain a valid partition table > > I don't know what could cause this. The sbp2 driver did a lot of SCSI > command conversions between the RBC and SBC command sets in older > kernels, and this was gradually pulled out of sbp2 because the sd driver > already handled RBC properly at some point. In Linux 2.6.15, sbp2 had > still all this conversion code but it was AFAIK already deadwood. > > However I don't know if there could really be differences in how very > old kernels sent SCSI commands which could cause the device to return > data with an offset. > > Perhaps the problem is not in what data the device returns when sd reads > from it, but in where the data is written into buffers. I.e. if going > through sbp2, the data might be written 8 bytes behind the actual start > of the data buffer. I will check in the SBP-2 spec if there is anything > that could be mistaken about the buffer address. > > By the way, in addition to the 8 bytes offset which you found, there is > also a difference in the reported disk size. The USB firmware says > 390721969 sectors, the FireWire firmware says 390721968 sectors. The > USB firmware's value seems to be the wrong one. Yes, i saw that as well. But one after the other. I'll send some more logging info to make things complete. Take a look at the dmesg, there's some failure in cache recognition. Hope it helps: The disk worked well with 2.4 kernels. I can't track down the 2.6 kernel histoy perfectly, but according to a memo, 2.6.15 was installed last year November, while the disk was still fine in march. Seems reasonable that I made a backup in march before another kernel upgrade without a full hardware test afterwards. And no, firmware was never touched or updated. stefaniello:~# cat /proc/version Linux version 2.6.15-1-686-smp (Debian 2.6.15-8) (waldi@debian.org) (gcc version 4.0.3 20060212 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-9)) #2 SMP Mon Mar 6 15:34:50 UTC 2006 stefaniello:~# lspci (excerpt) 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge (rev 04) 02:01.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments PCI4451 IEEE-1394 Controller stefaniello:~# lspci -n (excerpt) 00:00.0 0600: 8086:1a30 (rev 04) 02:01.2 0c00: 104c:8027 stefaniello:~# find /lib /usr/lib -name "*libraw*" /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.8.1.1 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so.8 stefaniello:/var/log# lsmod (excerpt) Module Size Used by sbp2 21732 0 sd_mod 17536 0 usb_storage 65600 0 scsi_mod 127592 3 sbp2,sd_mod,usb_storage ieee80211_crypt 5952 1 hostap pci_hotplug 25628 1 shpchp eth1394 19336 0 ide_core 115664 6 usb_storage,ide_generic,ide_cd,ide_disk,piix,generic uhci_hcd 29360 0 usbcore 116196 3 usb_storage,uhci_hcd ohci1394 31252 0 ieee1394 89848 3 sbp2,eth1394,ohci1394 As you can see, ohci1394 is used instead of pcilynx. This one doesn't seem to do anything if loaded and sbp2 won't see any storage device at all. stefaniello:~# dmesg (excerpt) ieee1394: Initialized config rom entry `ip1394' ohci1394: $Rev: 1313 $ Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:01.2[A] -> Link [LNKD] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ohci1394: fw-host0: OHCI-1394 1.0 (PCI): IRQ=[11] MMIO=[f8fff000-f8fff7ff] Max Packet=[2048] ieee1394: Host added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[484fc000221cb010] eth1394: $Rev: 1312 $ Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> eth1394: eth1: IEEE-1394 IPv4 over 1394 Ethernet (fw-host0) sbp2: $Rev: 1306 $ Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> ieee1394: sbp2: Driver forced to serialize I/O (serialize_io=1) ieee1394: sbp2: Try serialize_io=0 for better performance ohci1394: fw-host0: SelfID received, but NodeID invalid (probably new bus reset occurred): 0000FFC0 ieee1394: Error parsing configrom for node 0-00:1023 ieee1394: Node changed: 0-00:1023 -> 0-01:1023 ieee1394: Node added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[0030e00e82010087] scsi0 : SCSI emulation for IEEE-1394 SBP-2 Devices ieee1394: sbp2: Logged into SBP-2 device ieee1394: Node 0-00:1023: Max speed [S400] - Max payload [2048] Vendor: WDC WD20 Model: 00JB-00GVA0 Rev: Type: Direct-Access-RBC ANSI SCSI revision: 04 SCSI device sda: 390721968 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) sda: asking for cache data failed sda: assuming drive cache: write through SCSI device sda: 390721968 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) sda: asking for cache data failed sda: assuming drive cache: write through sda: sda1 sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda ieee1394: sbp2: Logged out of SBP-2 device stefaniello:/dev/disk# hwinfo --disk 19: SCSI 500.0: 10600 Disk [Created at block.222] UDI: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/storage_serial_0030e00e82010087_0_0 Unique ID: _q_W.vhEfakOr9HF Parent ID: _p6J.FYVVb9QLEAF SysFS ID: /block/sda SysFS BusID: 5:0:0:0 SysFS Device Link: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:02:01.2/fw-host0/0030e00e82010087/0030e00e82010087-0/host5/target5:0:0/5:0:0:0 Hardware Class: disk Model: "WDC WD20 00JB-00GVA0" Vendor: "WDC WD20" Device: "00JB-00GVA0" Driver: "sbp2", "sd" Device File: /dev/sda (/dev/sg0) Device Files: /dev/sda, /dev/disk/by-id/ieee1394-0030e00e82010087:0:0, /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:02:01.2-ieee1394-0x0030e00e82010087:0:0 Device Number: block 8:0-8:15 (char 21:0) Features: Hotpluggable Geometry (Logical): CHS 24321/255/63 Size: 390721968 sectors a 512 bytes Config Status: cfg=new, avail=yes, need=no, active=unknown Attached to: #15 (FireWire (IEEE 1394)) That's all info i can imagine at the moment. And with all information put together now, we might probably stop full-quoting at this point. cheers Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: /dev/sda with 8 byte offset 2007-09-27 19:48 ` Stefan Rutzinger @ 2007-09-29 11:31 ` Stefan Richter 2007-10-08 19:07 ` Stefan Rutzinger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Stefan Richter @ 2007-09-29 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Rutzinger; +Cc: linux1394-user, linux-scsi On 27 Sep, Stefan Rutzinger wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Stefan Richter wrote: >> By the way, in addition to the 8 bytes offset which you found, there is >> also a difference in the reported disk size. The USB firmware says >> 390721969 sectors, the FireWire firmware says 390721968 sectors. The >> USB firmware's value seems to be the wrong one. > > Yes, i saw that as well. But one after the other. I'll send some more > logging info to make things complete. Take a look at the dmesg, > there's some failure in cache recognition. Hope it helps: > > The disk worked well with 2.4 kernels. I can't track down the 2.6 kernel > histoy perfectly, but according to a memo, 2.6.15 was installed last year > November, while the disk was still fine in march. Seems reasonable that I > made a backup in march before another kernel upgrade without a full > hardware test afterwards. > > And no, firmware was never touched or updated. [...logs etc. snipped...] I swapped the DVD-RW in my only PL3507 based enclosure out for a HDD. The enclosure has a firmware written or modified by MacPower. >From Linux 2.6.23-rc6, connected via USB: usb 1-8: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 18 usb 1-8: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice scsi59 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices usb-storage: device found at 18 usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning scsi 59:0:0:0: Direct-Access ST340083 2A 3.03 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0 sd 59:0:0:0: [sde] 781422769 512-byte hardware sectors (400088 MB) sd 59:0:0:0: [sde] Write Protect is off sd 59:0:0:0: [sde] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00 sd 59:0:0:0: [sde] Assuming drive cache: write through sd 59:0:0:0: [sde] 781422769 512-byte hardware sectors (400088 MB) sd 59:0:0:0: [sde] Write Protect is off sd 59:0:0:0: [sde] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00 sd 59:0:0:0: [sde] Assuming drive cache: write through sde: sde1 sd 59:0:0:0: [sde] Attached SCSI disk sd 59:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg4 type 0 usb-storage: device scan complete sd 59:0:0:0: [sde] Sense Key : No Sense [current] sd 59:0:0:0: [sde] Add. Sense: No additional sense information # fdisk -l /dev/sde Disk /dev/sde: 400.0 GB, 400088457728 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 48641 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sde1 1 48641 390708801 83 Linux # dd if=/dev/sde of=mbr_usb bs=512 count=1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 512 bytes (512 B) copied, 0.0214703 s, 23.8 kB/s Connected via FireWire, using the new drivers: scsi60 : SBP-2 IEEE-1394 firewire_core: created new fw device fw4 (3 config rom retries, S400) firewire_core: phy config: card 1, new root=ffc0, gap_count=5 firewire_sbp2: logged in to fw4.0 LUN 0000 (0 retries) scsi 60:0:0:0: Direct-Access-RBC ST340083 2A PQ: 0 ANSI: 4 sd 60:0:0:0: [sde] 781422768 512-byte hardware sectors (400088 MB) sd 60:0:0:0: [sde] Write Protect is off sd 60:0:0:0: [sde] Mode Sense: 11 00 00 00 sd 60:0:0:0: [sde] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 60:0:0:0: [sde] 781422768 512-byte hardware sectors (400088 MB) sd 60:0:0:0: [sde] Write Protect is off sd 60:0:0:0: [sde] Mode Sense: 11 00 00 00 sd 60:0:0:0: [sde] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sde:<5>firewire_sbp2: sbp2_scsi_abort sd 60:0:0:0: scsi: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery sd 60:0:0:0: [sde] Result: hostbyte=DID_BUS_BUSY driverbyte=DRIVER_OK,SUGGEST_OK end_request: I/O error, dev sde, sector 0 Buffer I/O error on device sde, logical block 0 sd 60:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device Buffer I/O error on device sde, logical block 0 sd 60:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device Buffer I/O error on device sde, logical block 0 ldm_validate_partition_table(): Disk read failed. sd 60:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device Buffer I/O error on device sde, logical block 0 sd 60:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device Buffer I/O error on device sde, logical block 0 unable to read partition table sd 60:0:0:0: [sde] Attached SCSI disk sd 60:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg4 type 14 Connected via FireWire, using the old drivers: scsi65 : SBP-2 IEEE-1394 ieee1394: sbp2: Logged into SBP-2 device ieee1394: sbp2: Node 1-00:1023: Max speed [S400] - Max payload [2048] scsi 65:0:0:0: Direct-Access-RBC ST340083 2A PQ: 0 ANSI: 4 sd 65:0:0:0: [sdf] 781422768 512-byte hardware sectors (400088 MB) sd 65:0:0:0: [sdf] Write Protect is off sd 65:0:0:0: [sdf] Mode Sense: 11 00 00 00 sd 65:0:0:0: [sdf] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 65:0:0:0: [sdf] 781422768 512-byte hardware sectors (400088 MB) sd 65:0:0:0: [sdf] Write Protect is off sd 65:0:0:0: [sdf] Mode Sense: 11 00 00 00 sd 65:0:0:0: [sdf] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sdf: sdf1 sd 65:0:0:0: [sdf] Attached SCSI disk sd 65:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg4 type 14 Before this there was a login failure, something which I'm used to with this device. A little bit of replugging or power cycling got it to log in. # fdisk -l /dev/sdf Disk /dev/sdf: 400.0 GB, 400088457216 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 48641 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdf1 1 48641 390708801 83 Linux # dd if=/dev/sdf of=mbr_1394 bs=512 count=1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 512 bytes (512 B) copied, 0.000914592 s, 560 kB/s # diff mbr_* So, while fw-sbp2 and sbp2 under Linux 2.6.23-rc (fw-sbp2 with patches scheduled for 2.6.24) both have more or less difficulties to connect to the device, the MBR is the same as with USB and I can mount the existing partition and read data (which are the same as when I wrote them some time ago using an OXUF922 based enclosure). So either you have something else than a PL3507 or your firmware is too different from mine or my setup somehow failed to trigger the bug --- at least with the old drivers once they are able to log in, while the new drivers consistently end up with an offlined SCSI device. This could be an unrelated bug in the new drivers though. Note how I too get different disk sizes from USB and FireWire: 781422769 sectors = bogus USB value versus 781422768 sectors = most certainly the correct value via FireWire. (The firmwares for the USB and FireWire parts of the PL3507 are AFAIK entirely separate.) This off-by-one bug in USB firmware is a quite common one. Since you seem to have a Windows box at your disposal, try running the Prolific firmware uploader. I think it works through USB also for updating the FireWire firmware. The uploader should first tell you whether it is a PL3507 at all and what firmware it has currently installed. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== =--= ===-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: /dev/sda with 8 byte offset 2007-09-29 11:31 ` Stefan Richter @ 2007-10-08 19:07 ` Stefan Rutzinger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Stefan Rutzinger @ 2007-10-08 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Richter; +Cc: linux1394-user, linux-scsi Hi, thanks to my stupidity I found out only last weekend that `scsiinfo -i` in fact does create the fifo offset behaviour. However, `scsiinfo -a` as stefan described does not (this is why I haven't tried `-i` up to now). Well, the good news is that almost any other queries of scsiinfo instead of INQUIRY resets the device to its normal behaviour. And there's another workaround: Stop udevd before connecting the device and manually create the node /dev/sda. udevd is the bad guy who does the INQUIRY to detect the connected hardware. And yes, the firmware is crap. At USB, scsiinfo is only useful as a very poor random generator. The output is only garbage from each command to the next. However, I won't risk a firmware update up to now. Many thanks to Stefan Richter and Al Viro. Stefan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-08 19:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709262121040.17048@valhalla.fs.tum.de>
2007-09-26 20:55 ` /dev/sda with 8 byte offset Stefan Richter
2007-09-26 21:03 ` Al Viro
2007-09-27 6:45 ` Stefan Richter
2007-09-27 7:42 ` Al Viro
2007-09-27 19:48 ` Stefan Rutzinger
2007-09-29 11:31 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-08 19:07 ` Stefan Rutzinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox