From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] gdth: Make one abuse of scsi_cmnd less obvious Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:21:35 -0600 Message-ID: <20070930232135.GF12049@parisc-linux.org> References: <46FFFC8C.6080804@panasas.com> <47000367.6090402@panasas.com> <20070930212813.GD13343@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:33781 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752086AbXI3XVj (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:21:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070930212813.GD13343@infradead.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Boaz Harrosh , Jeff Garzik , James Bottomley , Matthew Wilcox , achim_leubner@adaptec.com, linux-scsi On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:28:13PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I think it would be better if your whole patch series goes ontop of > willy's ->done removal series instead. I really hope we can get that > one into scsi-misc ASAP. Actually, I think if Boaz simply flips this patch to be after his next one (or merges them ...), there's no real dependency on the ->done removal. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."