From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: scsi_wait_scan Kconfig option Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:16:52 -0700 Message-ID: <20071208221652.GA1159@parisc-linux.org> References: <20071207191242.71a9cc3e@linuxamd.linicks.net> <475A9810.4070104@anagramm.de> <20071208162122.7e77601e@linuxamd.linicks.net> <475B0AC7.2030408@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:52817 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752884AbXLHWQy (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 17:16:54 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <475B0AC7.2030408@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Richter Cc: Nick Warne , Clemens Koller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 10:21:11PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote: > Besides, in order for scsi_wait_scan to work, drivers need to support it > explicitly, don't they? If so, simply kill the "default m" from config > SCSI_WAIT_SCAN and let any driver which is integrated with it select it. No. All drivers which call scsi_scan_host() support it. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."