From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH acs_ame scsi driver 000 of 1] Introduction Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:55:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20071210165548.GC26334@parisc-linux.org> References: <87d84fba0712092003h3eb90344o89f9b0bc9c65fdb7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:41222 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753881AbXLJQzt (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:55:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d84fba0712092003h3eb90344o89f9b0bc9c65fdb7@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: chang jeff Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:03:18PM +0800, chang jeff wrote: > Dear Sir, > > Following is patche for scsi driver in 2.6.23.9 what should get into > 2.6.23.9-final if possible. > > First refines a newly created scsi driver > (/[kernel-version]/driver/scsi/acs_ame). > > Thanks, > JeffChang. Hi Jeff, You don't seem to have attached the driver ... maybe you sent a second email that hasn't arrived yet? I see Andrew sent a mail (possibly to one of your colleagues?) that explains that he doesn't personally take scsi driver patches: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/30/7 -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."